Załuski Wojciech, Why Moral Norms Cannot be Reduced to Facts: On a Trilemma in Derivations of Moral "Ought" from "Is"

Artykuły
Opublikowano: AFP 2019/2/63-74
Autor:
Rodzaj: artykuł

Why Moral Norms Cannot be Reduced to Facts: On a Trilemma in Derivations of Moral "Ought" from "Is"

The following article was prepared as part of the project realized by The Foundation of Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies “Humanities in Dialogue”, financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the program "Dialog" (no. of the contract: 0239/DLG/2018/10).

1.Two approaches to the problem of justification in ethics

One may endeavour to realize the (arguably) main task of ethical reflection – that of justifying moral norms – in two different ways, viz. either by embedding moral norms in normative statements (that is: the less specific moral norms in the more general ones) or in factual statements. The first approach encounters the notorious difficulty which consists in that in creating a „logical chain” of moral norms (in which every preceding – higher-level – norm is a direct basis for the derivation of the next one – a lower-level, more specific norm) we reach the most fundamental („highest-level”) moral norm(s) which cannot be derived from any other norm. This most fundamental moral norm(s) cannot therefore be...

Pełna treść dostępna po zalogowaniu do LEX