z dnia 24 marca 2015 r.
Application no. 33376/08
Aleksandr Alekseyevich TERENTYEV
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 24 March 2015 as a Committee composed of:
Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,
Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,
Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, judges,
and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 3 May 2008,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Aleksandr Alekseyevich Terentyev, is a Russian national, who was born in 1979 and is living in Novaya Vilga.
The Russian Government ("the Government") were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.
The applicant complained about delayed enforcement of the judgment in his favour taken by the justice of the peace of the Judicial District no. 2 of the Medvezhyegorskiy District of the Republic of Karelia dated 20 November 2007.
By letter dated 6 February 2014 the Government's observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 10 April 2014.
By letter dated 23 May 2014, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 10 April 2014 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant's attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letter sent to the applicant was delivered, however, no response has been provided. The Court notes that applicant did not inform the Court of any change in his contact details.
The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 16 April 2015.
Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska